Ulrich v. Matika

Citations

• 30 Pa. Super. 110
• 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 28

Syllabus

<p>Tax sales — Ejectment—Evidence—Personal property on premises.</p> <p>In an action of ejectment, where the defendant relies for title upon a tax sale, binding instructions cannot be given in his favor, where the testimony shows that during the period covered by the assessment of taxes for which the sale was made, there was sufficient personal property on the real estate sold to pay all the taxes assessed thereon, wliich might have been seized by the collector, if he had used due diligence.</p>