Ulrich v. Freedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party in patent litigation need not produce material that is subject to protective order because “it is not available to [party] or within their possession, custody or control within the contemplation of Rule 33(a) or Rule 34(a) of the Federal Rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).