Ulrich v. Exxon Co., USA, a Div. of Exxon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the \background circumstances\ test as imposing a\heightened burden\ and citing cases that have criticized it
• “[Personality conflicts with a supervisor certainly are not uncommon occurrences, nor do they give rise to an actionable legal wrong.”
• allegations of being “burned, snake bit and screwed” in ranking process without mention of race did not raise racial discrimination or constitute protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).