Skip to main content
· 8/10/2006

Ulrich v. Berbary

Citations

  • 445 F. Supp. 2d 267
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55726
  • 2006 WL 2335190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence is not ‘suppressed’ if the defendant either knew, or should have known, of the essential facts permitting him to take advantage of [the] evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bianchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.