Skip to main content
· 9/1/1989

Ulmer, Linda L. v. Harsco Corporation. Appeal of Linda Ulmer

Citations

  • 884 F.2d 98
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13062
  • 1989 WL 100170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding severance was due where “terms of [plaintiffs’] employment were significantly worsened” under new owner
  • continuing employment means working for original company not successor
  • continuing employment means working for original company not successor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Stapleton, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.