· 9/1/1989
Ulmer, Linda L. v. Harsco Corporation. Appeal of Linda Ulmer
Citations
- 884 F.2d 98
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13062
- 1989 WL 100170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding severance was due where “terms of [plaintiffs’] employment were significantly worsened” under new owner
- continuing employment means working for original company not successor
- continuing employment means working for original company not successor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Stapleton, Cowen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.