Skip to main content
· 5/26/1958

Ullom v. Boehm

Citations

  • 392 Pa. 643
  • 142 A.2d 19
  • 1958 Pa. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a law prohibiting opticians from advertising the prices of their products
  • statute prohibiting advertising of ophthalmic products was a valid exercise of police power that did not violate Article I, Section 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.