· 5/26/1958
Ullom v. Boehm
Citations
- 392 Pa. 643
- 142 A.2d 19
- 1958 Pa. LEXIS 484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a law prohibiting opticians from advertising the prices of their products
- statute prohibiting advertising of ophthalmic products was a valid exercise of police power that did not violate Article I, Section 7
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.