Ullom v. Agoston
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 696
Syllabus
Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings de novo review res judicata interlocutory order/ruling Civ.R. 41 dismissal. The trial court properly granted the defendants' motion for judgment on pleadings on the ground of res judicata. In the original action, when the trial court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of two defendants, that ended the case against those two defendants. Following the dismissal of the remaining claims, the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants became a final, appealable order. The plaintiffs failed to appeal. The plaintiffs' refiled action against the same defendants as in the original action, for the same dispute, was barred under the doctrine of res judicata.
Judges: O'Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 1,323×
- Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-12· cited 588×
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court· 1996-06-05· cited 418×
- Denham v. City of New CarlisleOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 209×
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-22· cited 105×
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Lorenz Equipment Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-07-20· cited 87×
- Pattison v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-16· cited 49×
- Schmitt v. Educational Serv. Ctr. of Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-17· cited 21×
- Shingler v. Provider Services Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.