Skip to main content
· 5/25/1993

Ulloa v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.

Citations

  • 822 F. Supp. 1566
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7769
  • 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1639
  • 1993 WL 188889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Employer is entitled to judgment when employee “has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that she received disparate treatment when compared to non-pregnant employees.”
  • Employer is entitled to judgment when employee \has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that she received disparate treatment when compared to non-pregnant employees.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Highsmith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.