Skip to main content
· 3/29/2001

Ullman v. Starbucks Corp.

Citations

  • 152 F. Supp. 2d 322
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3449
  • 2001 WL 303806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a new trial where plaintiff alleged in a conclusory manner that the trial judge made disparaging remarks about plaintiff’s counsel in front of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.