Ullman v. Lion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that the State’s lack of specificity was detrimental to his purported alibi defense
• distinguishing between an indictment, in which the State “aver[s] all material facts constituting the essential elements of an offense,” and a bill of particulars, which serves to “elucidate or particularize the conduct of the accused alleged to constitute the charged offense”
• distinguishing between an indictment, in which the State “aver[s] all material facts constituting the essential elements of an offense,” and a bill of particulars, which serves to “elucidate or particularize the conduct of the accused alleged to constitute the charged offense”
• purpose of a bill of particulars is to \elucidate or particularize the conduct of the accused alleged to constitute the charged offense\
• absent material detriment to the preparation of a defense, the omission of specific dates and times is without prejudice, and without constitutional consequence
• absent material detriment to the preparation of a defense, the omission of specific dates and times is without prejudice, and without constitutional consequence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).