Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he fact that the sentencing court did not state expressly that it considered each of these factors does not warrant reversal. \
• “It would be foolish, indeed, to take the position that if a court is in possession of the facts, it will fail to apply them to the case at hand.”
• “It would be foolish, indeed, to take the position that if a court is in possession of the facts, it will fail to apply them to the case at hand.”
• “It would be foolish, indeed, to take the position that if a court is in possession of the facts, it will fail to apply them to the case at hand”
• “It would be foolish, indeed, to take the position that if a court is in possession of the facts, it will fail to apply them to the case at hand.”
• “It would be foolish, indeed, to take the position that if a court is in possession of the facts, it will fail to apply them to the case at hand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).