UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. City of Sherwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no justiciable controversy when the State, in its answer, admitted that the plaintiff was entitled to relief
• finding no justiciable controversy when the State, in its answer, admitted that the plaintiff was entitled to relief
• no standard of review cited but review appears to be de novo because factors favoring appellant were weighed against inconvenience to ap-pellee
• no standard of review cited but review appears to be de novo because factors favoring appellant were weighed against inconvenience to appellee
• no standard of review cited, but review appears to be de novo because factors favoring appellant were “weighed” against inconvenience to appellee
• “One who does not intervene, whether or not by right, is not at risk of being bound by the litigation and is not subject to res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).