Uhrig v. Redding, Et Ux.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Upon dissolution of a partnership formed by one supplying all the capital, and another supplying only his labor and skill, the capital is returned to the partner supplying it unless the agreement is otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Florida Tomato Packers v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-05-07· cited 39×
• Town of Palm Beach v. Palm Beach County
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-10-18· cited 34×
• Russell v. Thielen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-06-29· cited 28×
• Cooper v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1972-09-21· cited 12×
• Boyd v. Walker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-22· cited 6×
• Swann v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-14· cited 6×
• Phillips v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-07-12· cited 5×
• Swann v. Mitchell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-05· cited 3×
• Myers v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-11· cited 2×
• Hector Supply Co. v. Martin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-05-25· cited 1×
• Sarduy v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-03· cited 1×
• Dyson v. Dyson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-21· cited 1×
• Lindberg v. Creative Construction of Palm Beach, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-16· cited 1×
• Williams v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-09-14
• Shobna, S.A. v. Maina
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-12
• Viking Realty, Inc. v. Balzebre
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-27

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Snowden v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 4×