Uhr v. East Greenbush Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that dual enforcement mechanisms may be inconsistent when they are based on different motivations and could produce unequal allocations of benefits due to differences in approach
• stating New York's test for implying a private right of action in a state statute
• “In Burns Jackson . . ., th[e] [New York] Court [of Appeals] articulated the standards that were synthesized into a three-part test in Sheehy . . . .” (quoting Sheehy,73 N.Y.2d at 633)
• “[T]he second prong is itself a two-part inquiry. We must first discern what the Legislature was seeking to accomplish when it enacted the statute, and then determine whether a private right of action would promote that objective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).