Uhr v. Davidyan

Citations

• 76 Pa. Super. 548
• 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 184

Syllabus

<p>Evidence — Expert evidence — Value of rugs — Admissibility.</p> <p>In an action of assumpsit to recover the value of a Serape rug, which was sent to a cleaner and not returned to the owner, it is not error to allow a duly qualified expert witness to testify as to the value of the rug, when other evidence as to its condition had been produced.</p> <p>The plaintiff having proved the condition of the rug, and no objection having been made to the competency of the expert, his evidence was admissible and furnished sufficient foundation for establishing value.</p>