Uhl v. Komatsu Forklift Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no evidence of fraud where defendants knew of a relationship between the arbitrator and opposing counsel and with the exercise of due diligence could have uncovered the relationships of which they now complain
• the arbitrator “qualified as having substantial experience as a products liability lawyer. Given [his and the plaintiffs] areas of concentration, it is reasonable to anticipate that their paths would cross frequently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).