Skip to main content
· 6/15/2006

Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United States

Citations

  • 452 F.3d 1289
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1097
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14660
  • 2006 WL 1642648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \it is not clear at this juncture\ that Shinyei relief would be available to the challenger
  • acknowledging that the Government \was unwilling to take a position\ on the availability of Shinyei relief
  • finding merits not so “clear-cut” as to deny injunction on likelihood of success factor
  • refusing to deny injunction when ultimate outcome on the merits was not “clear-cut”
  • “On review of the denial of a preliminary injunction, our judgment as to the merits of the plaintiff’s case is neces- sarily tentative.”
  • “[W]e do not hold that the trial court was required to grant a preliminary injunction just because the parties consented to one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Bryson, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.