Skip to main content
· 4/17/1916

Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Citations

  • 253 Pa. 394
  • 98 A. 574
  • 1916 Pa. LEXIS 854

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Passengers—Unusual ferie — Bes ipsa loquitur — Insufficient evidence — Nonsuit.</p> <p>In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted to a passenger' from the violent starting and subsequent jerking of a street ear, a nonsuit was properly entered where plaintiff stated that the car “started violently,” but there was no evidence as to any unusual or extraordinary starting or subsequent operation of the car.</p>

Judges: Brown, Frazer, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.