Skip to main content
· 4/22/1968

Uelmen v. Freeman

Citations

  • 390 U.S. 1026
  • 88 S. Ct. 1413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court has discretion to exclude evidence where due to interval between declaration and the time of previous event, \it concludes that there is no reasonable basis for finding that a continuity of [the previous] state of mind exists\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.