Udell v. University of Lowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]here is no dispute that information concerning the []defendants' finances is relevant regarding the issue of punitive damages.\
• “[T]here is no dispute that information concerning the counterdefendants’ finances is relevant regarding the issue of punitive damages.”
• “Rule 26(b) 20 is liberally interpreted to permit wide-ranging discovery of information even though the 21 information may not be admissible at the trial.”
• “Rule 26(b) is liberally interpreted to permit wide-ranging discovery of information even though the information may not be admissible at the trial.”
• “The discovery of 3 financial information relevant to a punitive damages claim is permissible under the Federal Rules 4 || of Civil Procedure ...”
• “The party who resists discovery has the 14 burden to show that discovery should not be allowed, and has the burden of clarifying, 15 explaining, and supporting its objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).