Ucak v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no reasonable likelihood that psychologist’s testimony would have changed the verdict, when the expert’s opinion conflicted “greatly [with] the facts recounted by the eyewitnesses to the events”
• defendant not justified in committing assault to avenge past wrongs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).