Ubaid Seth v. Najwa Aejaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in deciding whether interest is appropriate in a given case, the court should consider congressional intent
• stating that in deciding whether interest is appropriate in a given case, the court should consider congressional intent
• explaining that courts should weigh the “relative equities” when determining whether prejudgment interest should be awarded where Congress has been silent on the subject
• characterizing Brooklyn as a case involving this common-law remedial doctrine and making no mention of a prejudgment-interest statute
• interest not recoverable on penalty imposed on farmer for exceeding quota under Agricultural Adjustment Act
• penalties incurred under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 for marketing cotton in excess of fixed quotas should not bear pre-judgment interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).