U. States v. January & Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the moving party has carried its burden under Rule 56[], its opponent 12 must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.”
• “When the moving party has carried its burden under Rule 56[], its 12 opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material 13 facts.”
• “When the moving party has carried its burden under Rule 56[], its 12 opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material 13 facts.”
• “When the moving party has carried its burden under Rule 56[], its 12 opponent must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material 13 facts.”
• “The law, with respect to the application of particular payments when the debtor owes distinct debts, has long since been settled.... If [the debtor] neglects to make the application, the creditor may make it.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).