Skip to main content
· 3/23/1982

U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co., Inc., U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co., Inc

Citations

  • 671 F.2d 539
  • 217 U.S. App. D.C. 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • total cost method is disfavored because “it assumes that the defendant’s breach was the cause of all the extra cost”
  • “[T]he creditor may sue the surety directly without first obtaining a judgment against the principal debtor or even making a demand on it.” (citations omitted)
  • \It is common practice for a contractor to present claims of its subcontractors in a suit against the other party to the prime contract.\
  • “It is common practice for a contractor to present claims of its subcontractors in a suit against the other party to the prime contract.”
  • district court did not abuse its discretion in denying new trial where “there was conflicting evidence” and jury credited one party’s version of facts over the other’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, McGowan, Friedman, Claims

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.