U S G Interiors, Inc. v. Commercial & Architectural Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the language of the contract is clear and unambiguous, this rule of construction [construe the language against the drafter] is inapplicable.”
• when faced with “clear ‘ and explicit” language, court must “derive the parties’ intent and the meaning of the instrument solely from the writing itself’ and “cannot interpret the contract in a way which' is contrary to the plain and obvious meaning of these words.”
• applying this principle to a contract
• applying this principle to a contract
• applying this principle to a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).