Tzu Chien Chen v. Thomas & Betts Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We need not reach the issues of [defendant]’s alleged breach or [plaintiff]’s purported damages because the district court’s finding with respect to [plaintiff]’s non-performance is a sufficient basis for affirming its judgment as to the breach of contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
• Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 342×
• Garaux v. Pulley
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-08-01· cited 123×
• Portsmouth Square, Inc. v. Shareholders Protective Committee Palmer York, Jr. George E. Croke Eugene J. Marty Rose Leah Jones Kenneth R. Scott
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-09-09· cited 99×
• Bionghi v. Metropolitan Water District
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-03-30· cited 47×
• Pry Corp. of America v. Leach
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-02-04· cited 45×