Tze Wung Consultants, Ltd. v. Bank of Baroda (In Re Indu Craft, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Siemon is “consistent with those rulings of other circuits to have examined the issue”
• distinguishing In re Siemon but affirming that “time limits [] prescribed by statute for appeals to district courts acting as appellate courts over bankruptcy matters” are jurisdictional
• abrogating In re Siemon but recognizing that the “time limits ... prescribed by statute for appeals to district courts acting as appellate courts over bankruptcy matters” are jurisdictional
• distinguishing /n re Siemon, but affirming its holding that the “time limits [ ] prescribed by statute for appeals to district courts acting as appellate courts over bankruptcy matters” are jurisdictional
• distinguishing Bowles from an appeal from a district court's final judgment as an appellate body in a bankruptcy case on the basis that the latter was governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(b)(1
• “[E}ven though it is a bankruptcy rule that specifies the time within which an appeal must be filed, the statutory incorporation of that rule renders its requirement statutory and, hence, jurisdictional and nonwaivable.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).