Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/14/1989
Tyson v. State
Citations
- 543 N.E.2d 415
- 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 879
- 1989 WL 105571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Indiana recognizes the manifest necessity doctrine” when determining whether a retrial prompted by a mistrial is barred by double jeopardy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conover, Sullivan, Chezem
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-22· cited 985×
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 679×
- Cornero v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1931-03-23· cited 119×
- Crim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-04-17· cited 24×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-06-20· cited 22×
- Maddox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1951-12-04· cited 20×
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-03-05· cited 17×
- Mooberry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-08-22· cited 14×
- Whitehead v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-02-14· cited 10×
- Phillippe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-01-16· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.