Tyrone Patterson v. City of Omaha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, when assessing the findings of the jury, this Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, assuming as true all facts that the prevailing party’s evidence tended to prove
• upholding denial of new trial because jury’s award of nominal damages was consistent with evidence viewed most favorably to the verdict
• upholding denial of new trial because jury’s award of nominal damages was consistent with evidence most favorably to the verdict
• “A final decision is ordinarily one which disposes of all the rights of all the parties to an action.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).