TYRONE BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the analysis for DCHRA retaliation is the same as for Title VII
• noting that the analysis for DCHRA retaliation is the same for Title VII
• “Mr. Bryant has demonstrated that an individual who recommended his termination knew of his protected activity and that there was a direct chain of conversation between that individual (Superintendent Dunbar) and the decisionmaker (Director Schiraldi) about firing Mr. Bryant.” (emphasis added)
• intent to testify protected activity under the DCHRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).