Tyron Dwuan Mark v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Adolescent Family Life Act on its face did not violate the Establishment Clause, but remanding for examination of the constitutionality of particular applications
• holding that Adolescent Family Life Act on its face did not violate the Establishment Clause, but remanding for examination of the constitutionality of particular applications
• holding that taxpayers had standing to challenge the application of the Adolescent Family Life Act (AFLA)
• holding that Establishment Clause does not prevent religious organizations from participating in federally funded program
• concluding that the Adolescent Family Life Act was facially constitutional, but remanding for consideration of its constitutionality as applied to “pervasively sectarian” institutions
• holding that taxpayers had standing to challenge the application of the Adolescent Family Life Act (AFLA)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).