TYRELL A. DERONVILLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that a mayor could not adjudi- cate traffic violations if revenue from convictions consti- tuted a substantial portion of the municipality’s revenue
• concluding that the city mayor was an unconstitutionally biased adjudicator where fines he imposed for traffic offenses provided a substantial portion of village funds
• holding that plaintiff challenging constitutionality of statute authorizing quasi-judicial proceedings was entitled to due process in quasi-judicial hearing beyond de novo appeal to trial court
• concluding that the city mayor was an unconstitutionally biased adjudicator where fines he imposed for traffic offenses provided a substantial portion of village funds
• holding that a mayor could not judge traffic offenses where the major portion of his village’s income was from the fines, fees, and costs imposed in the mayor’s courts
• holding that plaintiff challenging constitutionality of statute authorizing quasi-judicial proceedings was entitled to due process in quasi-judicial hearing beyond de novo appeal to trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).