Tyra v. Harger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an agency was not required to prepare an EIS for state funded projects in a partially federally funded airport development
• identifying a large funding disparity and finding that the federal involvement was not sufficient to \federalize\ the project for NEPA purposes
• mere federal approval of aspects of airport expansion insufficient
• “NEPA limit[s] the act’s scope to major ‘federal’ actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).