Skip to main content
· 7/18/1906

Typothetæ of New York v. Typographical Union No. 6

Citations

  • 117 N.Y.S. 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the application of the forum defendant rule at the time the out of state defendant removed the action
  • finding “statutory text must control” and holding that the forum defendant rule is unambiguously conditioned upon a forum defendant being properly joined and served at the time of removal
  • collecting cases and concluding that the majority of courts “look to the plain meaning of the statute and conclude that removal before service on an in-forum defendant is permissible based on the “properly joined and served’ language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bischoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.