· 4/24/1984
Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.
Citations
- 679 P.2d 1310
- 1984 OK CIV APP 20
- 1984 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that OESC's finding of misconduct was erroneous because it \apparently relied on the premise that the company rule was reasonable and violation of it was misconduct per se. \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reynolds, Young, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.