Skip to main content
· 4/24/1984

Tynes v. Uniroyal Tire Co.

Citations

  • 679 P.2d 1310
  • 1984 OK CIV APP 20
  • 1984 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that OESC's finding of misconduct was erroneous because it \apparently relied on the premise that the company rule was reasonable and violation of it was misconduct per se. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynolds, Young, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.