Tynes v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that section 10 of the FAA did not preempt the provision for vacating or modifying an award contained in Pennsylvania’s arbitration act
• concluding that section 10 of the FAA did not preempt the provision for vacating or modifying an award contained in Pennsylvania's arbitration act
• concluding that section 10 of the FAA did not preempt the provision for vacating or modifying an award contained in Pennsylvania's arbitration act
• holding that a contract may only be modified with the assent of both parties
• “Terms in one section of the contract, therefore, should never be interpreted in a manner which nullifies other terms in the same agreement”
• “It is a general rule of law in the Commonwealth that where a contract refers to and incorporates the provisions of another, both shall be construed together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).