Tyner v. Nicholson (In Re Nicholson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that panel would review evidentiary standard challenged for the first time on appeal when the bankruptcy court’s application of an erroneous evidentiary standard might have caused it to reach a different result
• state law may control the “nature and extent” of exemptions, but “the manner in which such exemptions are to be claimed, set apart, and awarded, is regulated and determined by the federal courts, as a matter of procedure in the course of bankruptcy ad- ministration”
• state law may control the “nature and extent” of exemptions, but “the manner in which such exemptions are to be claimed, set apart, and awarded, is regulated and determined by the federal courts, as a matter of procedure in the course of bankruptcy ad- ministration”
• state law may control the “nature and extent” of exemptions, but “the manner in which such exemptions are to be claimed, set apart, and awarded, is regulated and determined by the federal courts, as a matter of procedure in the course of bankruptcy ad- ministration”
• partially abrogated on other 28 grounds
• partially abrogated on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).