Tyner v. Cory

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the ability of panels of the Court of Appeals to disagree with a prior panel opinion
• declining to follow the result in Almack v. Steeley, 43 Kan. App. 2d 764, 230 P.3d 452 [2010]
• \[A] district court's journal entry of judgment in a civil case controls over its prior oral statements from the bench.\
• “While we must carefully consider each precedent cited to us, we also must uphold our duty to correctly determine the law in each case that comes before us. In doing so, we sometimes find that we must respectfully disagree with the opinion of another panel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).