Tynecki v. Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing § 1983 claim because the complaint only alleged “that the defendants violated the plaintiff’s rights ‘under color of state law,’” but “contain[ed] no factual support therefore”
• “[E]xtensive regulation and financial aid, without more, is not sufficient to elevate defendants’ conduct to the level of state action.”
• private dental school's decision to expel student not motivated by the state despite governmental regulation and its participation in government projects
• private dental school not state actor by virtue of its discipline of student

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).