Tynan's Nissan, Inc. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that where a policy provides no coverage, an insurer cannot be held liable on a theory of bad faith refusal to pay
• recognizing that where a policy provides no coverage, an insurer cannot be held liable on a theory of bad faith refusal to pay
• affirming entry of summary judgment in favor of the insurer on bad faith claim where no coverage existed under the insurance policy
• reaching the 19 same outcome for an endorsement containing the phrase “shall become legally obligated 20 to pay as damages solely because of error or omission in failing to comply with § 130.”
• an insured’s expectations of coverage are not “reasonable” if they are “contrary to the plain and ordinary meaning of the policy language” and courts “will not alter the terms of coverage simply because an insured thought it had coverage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).