Skip to main content
· 9/9/2005

Tynan v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY

Citations

  • 909 So. 2d 991
  • 2005 WL 2175462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confirming that certiorari review is the appropriate mechanism to review an order denying issuance of a subpoena by a department hearing officer
  • noting that since the Department failed to afford Petitioner due process, the Department had a right to conduct a hearing which met due process requirements
  • noting that since the Department failed to afford Petitioner due process, the Department had a right to conduct a hearing which met due process requirements
  • rejecting claim that due process was violated when new hearing officer conducted additional evidentiary hearing after order was quashed
  • “[H]aving failed to accord Tynan due process in the first hearing, the Department had the right to conduct a hearing which met due process requirements.”
  • “[HJaving failed to accord Tynan due process in the first hearing, the Department had the right to conduct a hearing which met due process requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.