Tylo Sauna, S.A. v. Amerec Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it was appropriate for 13 the trial court to instruct the jury that they were permitted to “infer the existence of 14 secondary meaning from a finding of intentional copying”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).