Skip to main content
· 1/6/2011

Tyler v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees

Citations

  • 628 F.3d 980
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 173
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,077
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 161
  • 2011 WL 31515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a nine-month interval did not satisfy the causation element of a prima facie case
  • holding that plaintiff who filed an EEOC charge alleging retaliation did not exhaust his administrative remedies for sex discrimination claim where EEOC charge left sex discrimination box unchecked, only alleged retaliation, and never mentioned sex
  • explaining that statistical evidence from a small sample size, such as six or ten individuals, does not support an inference of discriminatory intent
  • noting that timing may give rise to inference of retaliation
  • dismissing plaintiff for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to his claims of gender and disability discrimination
  • finding a failure to exhaust administrative remedies where the complainant failed to reference gender discrimination in his charge of discrimination.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.