Skip to main content

Tyler v. State

Citations

  • 793 So. 2d 137
  • 2001 WL 953418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant sufficiently demonstrated prejudice when he alleged that he would have refuted a witness' claim that he had confessed to the crime and would have testified that he was not involved in the crime and was instead an unintended victim
  • concluding that the record did not refute the defendant's allegation of prejudice because he alleged that he would have testified that he was not involved in the crime, and his testimony would have refuted a witness's testimony that the defendant had confessed to the crime
  • noting allegation, if true, that uncalled witness would provide exculpatory version of events is sufficient to show prejudice
  • remanding for an evidentiary hearing where defendant alleged that trial counsel misinformed him that the jury would hear specific nature of prior convictions as impeachment, and did not testify
  • remanding for an evidentiary hearing where defendant alleged that trial counsel misinformed him that the jury would hear specific nature of prior convictions as impeachment, and did not testify
  • \Absolute certainty regarding potential testimony is not required in order to state a facially sufficient claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.