Tyler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an indictment must allege a DUI offense is a second or subsequent offense to show the court’s jurisdiction
• holding an indictment must allege a DUI offense is a second or subsequent offense to show the court's jurisdiction
• concluding habeas corpus cannot be used as substitute for PCR
• ‘‘[T]he allegation of the indictment that the crime charged was a second or subsequent offense was necessary to show the jurisdiction of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Burdette
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 87×
• Wheeler v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-03-31· cited 30×
• Simpson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 29×
• State v. Scriven
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 28×
• Wilson v. Moore
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-05-25· cited 22×
• McCreight v. MacDougall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-07-27· cited 11×
• Pennington v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-02-07· cited 5×
• No. 98-6577
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-05-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jacobs
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-05-08· cited 27×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-11-04· cited 14×
• Babb v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-05-08· cited 11×
• Grant v. MacDougall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-07-01· cited 6×
• State v. Garlington
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1900-01-06· cited 6×
• Bowers v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-10-30· cited 5×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-12-05· cited 5×
• State v. Ramey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-01-08· cited 4×