Tylee & Dempsey v. M'Lean & Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that contract terms are ambiguous if “reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation” and that the court may consider extrinsic evidence to make its ambiguity determination
• even where uncontroverted 27 evidence allows for conflicting inferences to be drawn, 28 interpretation of contract is solely a judicial function
• even where uncontroverted 16 evidence allows for conflicting inferences to be drawn, 17 interpretation of contract is solely a judicial function
• even where uncontroverted 27 evidence allows for conflicting inferences to be drawn, 28 interpretation of contract is solely a judicial function
• even where uncontroverted 16 evidence allows for conflicting inferences to be drawn, 17 interpretation of contract is solely a judicial function
• even where uncontroverted evidence allows for conflicting inferences to be drawn, interpretation of contract solely a judicial function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).