Skip to main content
· 7/8/1994

Federal Case

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 137
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 1376
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \An expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.\
  • “An expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.”
  • “[a]n expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.”
  • “[a]n expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.”
  • “An expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and not supported by the record.”
  • “An expert’s opinion should be excluded when it is based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.