TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the UUPA is not a true escheat statute but rather a custodial taking law
• \It is presumed that the legislature has expressed its intent in a statute and that it intended what it so expressed. The statute should then be interpreted to attain that purpose and end. . . . A reasonable and rational construction is preferred.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).