New York Court of Appeals· 11/20/1984
Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty Associates
Citations
- 63 N.Y.2d 396
- 472 N.E.2d 315
- 482 N.Y.S.2d 465
- 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In construing a contract, one of a court’s goals is to avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless.”
- “In construing a contract one of a court’s goals is to avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless.”
- “In construing a contract, one of a court’s goals is to avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless”
- “[0]ne of a court’s goals is to avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless.”
- “In construing a contract, one of a court’s goals is to avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless.”
- court should construe contract in such a way that would not leave clauses meaningless
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- The Matter of Senator Tony Avella v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 2017-06-06· cited 277×
- Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nSecond Circuit· 2018-08-02· cited 221×
- Kuper v. IovenkoSixth Circuit· 1995-10-04· cited 195×
- Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors· 2017-12-12· cited 131×
- Uribe v. MERCHS. BANK OF NYNew York Court of Appeals· 1998-03-31· cited 98×
- Namad v. Salomon Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1989-07-06· cited 77×
- 150 Broadway N.Y. Associates, L.P. v. BodnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-11-04· cited 67×
- ESPN, Inc. v. Office of the Commissioner of BaseballS.D. New York· 1999-11-23· cited 66×
- Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Ed. Geistlich Söhne A.G. Für Chemische IndustrieSecond Circuit· 2015-04-10· cited 64×
- Ronnen v. Ajax Electric Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1996-07-09· cited 60×
- Sayers v. Rochester Telephone Corp. Supplemental Management Pension PlanSecond Circuit· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
- Top of the Track Associates v. Lewiston Raceways, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-02-23· cited 41×
- Daniel Goldreyer, Ltd. v. Van De WeteringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-07-13· cited 40×
- Perlbinder v. Board of Managers of the 411 East 53rd Street CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-09-29· cited 38×
- Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. New York Blood Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-04-01· cited 38×
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.S.D. New York· 1996-11-20· cited 33×
- Continental Casualty Company v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Ppg Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1990-12-17· cited 30×
- Barrow v. Lawrence United Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-03-02· cited 30×
- Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-05-22· cited 30×
- International Fidelity Insurance v. County of RocklandS.D. New York· 2000-05-18· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.