Twinton Properties Partnership v. Nidiffer (In Re Twinton Properties Partnership)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not bring suit to recover property where “[n]one of the persons through whom his chain of title was asserted paid any property taxes on the property for the last 20 years, if at all.”
• discussing adverse possession only after concluding that “Twinton ha[d] proven a satisfactory chain of title to the land” and failing to address the adversity requirement
• applying Tennessee law to determine that Twinton proved a satisfactory chain of title to the land in question and “[a]lternatively, Twinton holds legal title through adverse possession[]” under Tennessee Code Annotated section 28-2-101.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).